Knowing how to write synthesis of study is essential for creating a strong and focused literature review. A synthesis goes beyond listing studies it organizes key findings, highlights connections and contradictions, and identifies research gaps.
This guide walks you through each step of writing an effective synthesis, helping you turn individual studies into a clear foundation for your research.
Table of Contents
What Is a Synthesis of Studies?
A synthesis of studies is a part of the literature review that examines multiple research sources together. Instead of summarizing each study one by one, it organizes them by common themes, patterns, or research issues. The goal is to show how studies relate to each other and what they reveal about the topic.
Learning How to Write Synthesis of Study is essential for presenting a clear and meaningful review of related literature. It helps you move beyond description and toward critical analysis, allowing you to create a solid foundation for your research.
What It Does:
- Shows relationships between studies
- Highlights patterns, similarities, and contradictions
- Identifies gaps in the existing research
- Builds a logical foundation for your study
How to Write Synthesis of Study: Step-by-Step
Writing a synthesis of a study involves analyzing multiple research sources and combining them into a unified, theme-based discussion. This section provides a clear and structured guide on how to write a synthesis of a study, starting from preparation to actual writing.
Phase 1: Pre-Writing
Before you begin writing the synthesis, you need to prepare and organize your sources. This phase ensures that your synthesis is focused, meaningful, and aligned with your research goals.
Step 1: Understand the Purpose of Synthesis
Start by knowing why synthesis matters. You’re not just reporting what others said, you’re connecting studies to find meaning. In the context How to Write Synthesis of Study, your goal is to:
- Identify how the studies relate to one another
- Discover patterns, contradictions, or gaps
- Lay the groundwork for your research argument
Keep in mind: the quality of your synthesis depends on how well you understand the studies you’re analyzing.
Step 2: Collect and Read Relevant Literature
Gather journal articles, books, and academic papers directly related to your research question. Don’t just collect, analyze:
- What are the key findings?
- What methods were used?
- Are there similarities or differences in results?
- What are the authors’ conclusions?
Use tools like a literature matrix or spreadsheet to track these points across sources. This will help you spot recurring ideas, disagreements, or missing pieces.
Step 3: Group Studies by Theme or Pattern
Once you’ve reviewed your sources, begin sorting them into thematic categories instead of listing them one by one. Look for:
- Shared topics or subtopics
- Common methods or frameworks
- Similar or opposing findings
- Periods or geographic contexts
This step is critical in How to Write Synthesis of Study because it sets up the structure of your synthesis paragraphs later.
Example of themes:
- Studies focused on technology use in learning
- Research comparing online vs. face-to-face learning
- Contradictory findings about student engagement
Organizing by theme allows you to synthesize more naturally, rather than falling into a study-by-study summary.
Phase 2: Writing the Synthesis
This phase covers how to turn your organized research into clear, focused synthesis paragraphs. Follow these steps to write analytically and purposefully.
Step 4: Start with a Topic Sentence
Begin each paragraph with a clear topic sentence that introduces the central idea or theme. This sentence sets the focus and signals how the studies are connected.
Example:
Several studies have explored how mobile technology affects student engagement in online learning.
Step 5: Combine Evidence from Multiple Sources
Integrate findings from two or more studies that support, extend, or contradict each other. Avoid listing studies individually. Instead, paraphrase and group their findings to build a bigger picture.
Example:
Garcia (2021) reported that mobile learning apps increased participation rates, while Chen and Malik (2022) observed similar outcomes in hybrid learning environments. In contrast, Rivera (2023) found no significant effect when apps lacked interactive features.
Step 6: Provide Critical Analysis
After presenting the evidence, analyze it. Go beyond description. Look at methods, strengths, limitations, and conflicting results. This is the critical thinking stage of how to write synthesis of study, where your voice becomes active.
Example:
Although the studies generally support the benefits of mobile learning, they rely on short-term data and self-reported engagement, which may limit their reliability. Few studies explore long-term academic outcomes.
Step 7: Link the Synthesis to Your Research
End the paragraph by showing how the synthesis leads into your study. Point out the research gap, contradiction, or opportunity that justifies your work.
Example:
These findings reveal a need for deeper investigation into how mobile learning tools affect sustained academic performance, which this study aims to explore over a full academic term.
Step 8: Use Transitions and Maintain Logical Flow
Use academic transitions to guide the reader through comparisons, contrasts, and conclusions. This keeps your synthesis smooth and connected.
Useful transitions:
- To compare: “Similarly,” “In line with,” “Likewise”
- To contrast: “However,” “On the other hand,” “In contrast”
- To analyze: “This suggests that,” “Despite these results,” “This highlights”
- To transition to your study: “This gap indicates,” “This supports the need for,” “This leads to the present study.”
This step-by-step approach to How to Write Synthesis of Study helps ensure your literature review is analytical, organized, and directly tied to your research. It builds the bridge between what is known and what your study will contribute.
Do’s and Don’ts of Writing a Synthesis of Study
Here are key practices to follow and common mistakes to avoid when learning How to Write Synthesis of Study effectively.
Do’s | Why It Matters | Don’ts | Why It’s a Problem |
---|---|---|---|
Group studies by theme, not author | Helps show relationships and trends across sources | Summarize each study one by one | Leads to a list, not a synthesis weak analysis |
Use at least 2–4 sources per paragraph | Shows depth and cross-comparison | Use only one source per paragraph | Doesn’t qualify as synthesis just summary |
Analyze, compare, and critique studies | Demonstrates critical thinking and originality | Only describe what the studies say | Misses the chance to evaluate or find gaps |
Paraphrase properly using your own words | Maintains academic tone and avoids plagiarism | Overuse direct quotations | Weakens your academic voice and reduces originality |
Link each synthesis paragraph to your research | Makes the literature review relevant and purposeful | Leave paragraphs disconnected from your study | The reader won’t see the value of your research |
Use transitions to guide flow | Improves readability and logical structure | Jump between ideas without transitions | Confuses the reader; ideas feel scattered |
Highlight gaps, contradictions, and patterns | Justifies the need for your study | Ignore differences or conflicts in results | Misses opportunities to identify research gaps |
Maintain a formal academic tone | Increases credibility and clarity | Use informal or vague language | Lowers academic quality; lacks professionalism |
Common Problems in Writing the Synthesis of a Study
Even when researchers know How to Write Synthesis of Study, certain common mistakes can weaken the literature review.
Here’s what to avoid and how to fix it.
Problem | Why It’s a Problem | How to Fix It |
---|---|---|
Listing studies instead of synthesizing | Your review sounds like a catalog; no insight or connection | Group studies by themes, not authors; focus on shared findings or contrasting points |
Lack of analysis | Shows no critical thinking; weak foundation for your study | After summarizing, add your interpretation evaluate methods, findings, or gaps |
Weak or missing topic sentences | Leaves paragraphs unfocused; readers get lost | Start each paragraph by stating the main idea/theme clearly |
No connection to your research | Makes it unclear why you’re reviewing these studies | Always end paragraphs by linking findings to your research gap or objective |
Too many direct quotes | Makes your writing sound copied; lacks originality | Paraphrase most content in your own words; use direct quotes only when necessary |
Poor use of transitions | Disrupts the flow; ideas feel disjointed | Use linking words like “however,” “in contrast,” or “this supports” to guide the reader |
Including irrelevant studies | Wastes space and distracts from your argument | Only include studies that directly support or relate to your synthesis theme |
Repetitive points | Makes your writing dull and redundant | Ensure each paragraph adds a new insight or develops the theme further |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Writing the Synthesis of Study
How many studies should I include in one synthesis paragraph?
Aim for 2 to 4 studies per paragraph, grouped by theme. Too few makes it weak; too many can overwhelm the reader. Focus on quality, not quantity.
Can I use direct quotations in a synthesis?
Yes, but use them sparingly. Quoting too much takes the focus away from your analysis. It’s better to paraphrase and show how the ideas relate to each other.
What if the studies I reviewed contradict each other?
That’s actually a good thing. Highlight the contradiction it may reveal a research gap or unresolved issue. Contrasting findings can make your synthesis stronger if you explain why the results differ.
How do I know if I’m synthesizing or just summarizing?
If you’re describing one study at a time, that’s summarizing. If you’re linking studies together by theme, showing patterns or differences, and offering insight, that’s synthesis.
Do I need to explain the methodology of each study in the synthesis?
Only if the method directly affects the findings or helps explain a contradiction. Otherwise, keep the focus on the results and how they connect.
How long should a synthesis section be?
There’s no fixed length, but it should be long enough to show depth and short enough to stay focused. For most academic works, a synthesis section might be 2–5 paragraphs, depending on the number of themes.
Final Thoughts
Learning How to Write Synthesis of Study is a key research skill. It allows you to move beyond simple summaries and create a well-organized, critical, and meaningful literature review. A strong synthesis shows that you understand the current research, can identify patterns and gaps, and are prepared to justify your study.
Always focus on clarity, relevance, and critical insight. When done right, synthesis strengthens your argument and highlights the importance of your research in the academic conversation.
Continue Learning: Explore the Rest of Chapter 2
Now that you’ve learned how to write synthesis of study, it’s time to see where it fits in the full flow of Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Studies.
The synthesis of studies helps you:
- Combine and analyze findings from local and foreign studies
- Show patterns, gaps, and contradictions across research
- Justify your study’s relevance and originality
- Bridge past studies with your current research direction
But remember, synthesis is only one part of Chapter 2. A complete Chapter 2 builds the full research foundation by covering both literature and studies.
Structure of Chapter 2
- Theoretical Framework
- Conceptual Framework
- Review of Related Literature
- Local Literature
- Foreign Literature
- Review of Related Studies
- Local Studies
- Foreign Studies
- Synthesis of Literature
- Synthesis of Studies (you are here)
- Research Gap
Explore Other Research Chapters
Once Chapter 2 is complete, continue developing your research paper with these next chapters:
- Chapter 3 → Research Design, Methodology, and Research Instruments
- Chapter 4 → Data Presentation, Interpretation, and Analysis of Results
- Chapter 5 → Conclusions, Major Findings, and Practical Recommendations
Note: We’re not your school’s official research coordinator, but our guides are designed to support and guide your writing process. Always follow your institution’s specific guidelines and formatting requirements.. Read full disclaimer below.
Information Disclaimer
Notice:
Philscholar® is an informational platform dedicated to sharing scholarship and grant opportunities. While we provide guides and articles to assist with admissions and scholarship applications, we do not directly process applications or award scholarships.
Users are encouraged to verify all details independently, as information is for reference purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, scholarship criteria, deadlines, and other details may change without prior notice.
For further verification or inquiries, please refer to the official sources provided at the end of the content section. Read full disclaimer below.
Be Updated!
Stay updated and never miss important scholarship, research, and other announcements through our official channels:
📧 Subscribe to our Email Newsletter for Updates
Leave a Reply